bug-bounty458
google364
microsoft314
facebook272
xss250
apple179
malware176
rce165
exploit141
cve111
account-takeover104
bragging-post101
phishing84
privilege-escalation81
csrf81
supply-chain68
stored-xss65
authentication-bypass63
dos63
browser62
reflected-xss57
react54
cloudflare51
reverse-engineering49
cross-site-scripting48
input-validation48
aws48
docker47
node47
access-control47
smart-contract45
web343
ethereum43
sql-injection43
web-security42
ssrf42
defi42
web-application41
oauth37
writeup37
race-condition36
burp-suite35
vulnerability-disclosure34
info-disclosure34
idor34
html-injection33
cloud33
auth-bypass33
lfi32
smart-contract-vulnerability32
0
6/10
This article explains how inline assembly semantics fit into the Rust Abstract Machine by proposing a "storytelling" approach: every inline assembly block must have a corresponding Rust code equivalent that describes its observable behavior, allowing the compiler to reason about soundness and apply optimizations correctly. The author demonstrates why inline assembly cannot arbitrarily violate Abstract Machine constraints like aliasing rules, even though assembly itself doesn't have these concepts.
rust
inline-assembly
abstract-machine
undefined-behavior
memory-safety
aliasing
tree-borrows
ffi
compiler-semantics
formal-verification
Rust
Tree Borrows
Stacked Borrows
Miri
rustc