bug-bounty451
google354
xss338
microsoft283
facebook246
apple171
exploit163
rce160
malware102
account-takeover95
cve91
bragging-post86
csrf83
browser77
writeup75
privilege-escalation68
react60
authentication-bypass57
cloudflare54
dos53
node52
docker51
ssrf51
phishing50
aws48
access-control47
oauth45
smart-contract45
supply-chain44
ethereum43
defi42
web342
sql-injection41
lfi37
idor35
vulnerability-disclosure32
smart-contract-vulnerability32
clickjacking31
burp-suite31
info-disclosure31
race-condition31
web-application31
reverse-engineering31
wordpress30
input-validation30
web-security29
information-disclosure29
cloud29
reflected-xss29
solidity27
0
6/10
This article explains how inline assembly semantics fit into the Rust Abstract Machine by proposing a "storytelling" approach: every inline assembly block must have a corresponding Rust code equivalent that describes its observable behavior, allowing the compiler to reason about soundness and apply optimizations correctly. The author demonstrates why inline assembly cannot arbitrarily violate Abstract Machine constraints like aliasing rules, even though assembly itself doesn't have these concepts.
rust
inline-assembly
abstract-machine
undefined-behavior
memory-safety
aliasing
tree-borrows
ffi
compiler-semantics
formal-verification
Rust
Tree Borrows
Stacked Borrows
Miri
rustc