bug-bounty500
xss244
rce151
google143
bragging-post120
malware118
microsoft115
facebook95
open-source91
account-takeover90
cve88
exploit87
privilege-escalation86
authentication-bypass76
csrf75
stored-xss72
access-control65
phishing64
ai-agents63
reflected-xss61
web-security53
input-validation53
apple52
sql-injection49
cross-site-scripting48
reverse-engineering48
smart-contract46
tool46
defi45
ethereum45
privacy44
supply-chain44
web-application43
ssrf41
dos41
web341
information-disclosure39
llm37
responsible-disclosure37
cloudflare36
api-security36
burp-suite35
opinion35
automation34
vulnerability-disclosure34
idor32
machine-learning32
infrastructure31
writeup31
denial-of-service31
0
6/10
This article explains how inline assembly semantics fit into the Rust Abstract Machine by proposing a "storytelling" approach: every inline assembly block must have a corresponding Rust code equivalent that describes its observable behavior, allowing the compiler to reason about soundness and apply optimizations correctly. The author demonstrates why inline assembly cannot arbitrarily violate Abstract Machine constraints like aliasing rules, even though assembly itself doesn't have these concepts.
rust
inline-assembly
abstract-machine
undefined-behavior
memory-safety
aliasing
tree-borrows
ffi
compiler-semantics
formal-verification
Rust
Tree Borrows
Stacked Borrows
Miri
rustc