bug-bounty449
google354
xss340
microsoft283
facebook246
apple171
exploit163
rce160
malware102
account-takeover95
cve91
bragging-post84
csrf83
browser77
writeup76
privilege-escalation68
react60
authentication-bypass57
cloudflare54
dos53
node52
ssrf51
docker51
phishing50
aws48
access-control47
oauth45
smart-contract45
supply-chain44
ethereum43
web342
defi42
sql-injection41
lfi37
idor35
vulnerability-disclosure32
smart-contract-vulnerability32
info-disclosure31
race-condition31
burp-suite31
web-application31
reverse-engineering31
clickjacking31
wordpress30
information-disclosure29
cloud29
input-validation29
web-security28
reflected-xss27
solidity27
0
6/10
This article explains how inline assembly semantics fit into the Rust Abstract Machine by proposing a "storytelling" approach: every inline assembly block must have a corresponding Rust code equivalent that describes its observable behavior, allowing the compiler to reason about soundness and apply optimizations correctly. The author demonstrates why inline assembly cannot arbitrarily violate Abstract Machine constraints like aliasing rules, even though assembly itself doesn't have these concepts.
rust
inline-assembly
abstract-machine
undefined-behavior
memory-safety
aliasing
tree-borrows
ffi
compiler-semantics
formal-verification
Rust
Tree Borrows
Stacked Borrows
Miri
rustc