bug-bounty490
google398
microsoft329
xss293
facebook288
rce199
exploit191
apple187
malware173
cve127
account-takeover113
bragging-post101
csrf86
privilege-escalation85
phishing81
browser80
supply-chain67
writeup66
dos66
stored-xss64
react64
authentication-bypass62
reflected-xss57
cloudflare56
node55
reverse-engineering53
ssrf51
aws51
docker50
input-validation48
access-control47
cross-site-scripting46
oauth46
smart-contract45
web345
ethereum43
defi42
sql-injection42
lfi41
web-security40
info-disclosure40
cloud39
web-application39
race-condition38
pentest37
ctf36
idor35
burp-suite35
vulnerability-disclosure34
html-injection33
0
7/10
research
This article explores how dependent type systems in Lean 4 can serve as executable specifications, allowing AI-generated code to be verified as correct by the compiler rather than through traditional testing. The author demonstrates this with a worked example of AI-generated sorting implementations where the type signature itself encodes the correctness proof.
dependent-types
type-systems
formal-verification
lean-4
ai-code-generation
proof-assistants
curry-howard-correspondence
refinement-types
correctness-by-construction
sorting-algorithms
inductive-types
theorem-proving
Lean 4
Claude
Curry-Howard correspondence
IEEE