bug-bounty448
google354
microsoft311
facebook262
xss238
apple179
malware174
rce149
exploit124
bragging-post101
cve99
account-takeover93
phishing83
csrf79
privilege-escalation77
supply-chain65
stored-xss65
authentication-bypass63
dos60
browser57
reflected-xss57
react50
cloudflare49
cross-site-scripting48
reverse-engineering48
input-validation48
access-control47
aws45
docker45
smart-contract45
node44
sql-injection43
ethereum43
web343
defi42
web-security42
web-application41
ssrf38
burp-suite35
idor34
vulnerability-disclosure34
info-disclosure33
race-condition33
html-injection33
cloud32
writeup32
oauth32
buffer-overflow32
smart-contract-vulnerability32
information-disclosure30
0
7/10
research
This article explores how dependent type systems in Lean 4 can serve as executable specifications, allowing AI-generated code to be verified as correct by the compiler rather than through traditional testing. The author demonstrates this with a worked example of AI-generated sorting implementations where the type signature itself encodes the correctness proof.
dependent-types
type-systems
formal-verification
lean-4
ai-code-generation
proof-assistants
curry-howard-correspondence
refinement-types
correctness-by-construction
sorting-algorithms
inductive-types
theorem-proving
Lean 4
Claude
Curry-Howard correspondence
IEEE