bug-bounty448
google355
microsoft313
facebook262
xss238
apple180
malware174
rce149
exploit124
bragging-post101
cve99
account-takeover93
phishing83
csrf79
privilege-escalation77
stored-xss65
supply-chain65
authentication-bypass63
dos60
reflected-xss57
browser57
react50
cloudflare49
reverse-engineering48
input-validation48
cross-site-scripting48
access-control47
smart-contract45
docker45
aws45
node44
ethereum43
web343
sql-injection43
web-security42
defi42
web-application41
ssrf38
burp-suite35
vulnerability-disclosure34
idor34
race-condition33
html-injection33
info-disclosure33
smart-contract-vulnerability32
writeup32
buffer-overflow32
cloud32
oauth32
information-disclosure30
0
7/10
research
This article explores how dependent type systems in Lean 4 can serve as executable specifications, allowing AI-generated code to be verified as correct by the compiler rather than through traditional testing. The author demonstrates this with a worked example of AI-generated sorting implementations where the type signature itself encodes the correctness proof.
dependent-types
type-systems
formal-verification
lean-4
ai-code-generation
proof-assistants
curry-howard-correspondence
refinement-types
correctness-by-construction
sorting-algorithms
inductive-types
theorem-proving
Lean 4
Claude
Curry-Howard correspondence
IEEE