bug-bounty622
facebook464
xss316
google151
rce105
microsoft97
apple65
csrf61
account-takeover54
web354
writeup51
exploit42
sqli41
cve37
ssrf35
cloudflare33
dos33
malware29
privilege-escalation29
defi28
smart-contract-vulnerability25
idor24
subdomain-takeover24
ethereum23
smart-contract23
clickjacking23
access-control21
node21
vulnerability-disclosure21
browser20
auth-bypass20
lfi19
aws19
remote-code-execution18
react17
cloud17
reverse-engineering16
cors16
docker16
oauth15
info-disclosure15
race-condition15
solidity14
authentication-bypass14
supply-chain13
phishing13
wordpress12
denial-of-service11
sql-injection11
delegatecall11
0
5/10
Part 2 of a security benchmark study comparing LLM-based security scanners (Neo, Claude Code) against traditional SAST/DAST tools on AI-generated code, finding that Neo detects more true positives with fewer false positives by validating findings against running applications.
sast
dast
code-analysis
llm-security
vulnerability-detection
ai-generated-code
security-tooling
benchmark
static-analysis
dynamic-analysis
ProjectDiscovery Neo
Claude Code