Instagram to remove end-to-end encryption for private messages in May

Instagram to remove end-to-end encryption for private messages in May | Instagram | The Guardian Skip to main content Skip to navigation Skip to navigation A spokesperson for Meta said the decision to abandon encryption on Instagram messages was due to low uptake. Photograph: Michael Dwyer/AP View image in fullscreen A spokesperson for Meta said the decision to abandon encryption on Instagram messages was due to low uptake. Photograph: Michael Dwyer/AP Instagram Instagram to remove end-to-end encryption for private messages in May Meta’s announcement comes after years of criticism from child safety groups over feature Josh Taylor Technology reporter Wed 18 Mar 2026 04.52 CET Last modified on Wed 18 Mar 2026 04.54 CET Share Prefer the Guardian on Google Instagram will stop encrypting private messages between users from May, after enduring years of criticism from law enforcement and child safety groups over the feature. Meta quietly announced this month on its help page for Instagram and in an updated 2022 news post that end-to-end encryption would no longer be available on direct messages between users on Instagram from 8 May 2026. It means Meta will be able to see the contents of messages between all users – which so far it only could for those who did not enable encryption. The feature already appeared deactivated for Australian users, when Guardian Australia tested on Wednesday. A spokesperson for Meta said the decision to abandon encryption was due to low uptake. I clicked on an Instagram post about a happy dog – and opened a hellish portal | Polly Hudson Read more “Very few people were opting in to end-to-end encrypted messaging in DMs, so we’re removing this option from Instagram in the coming months,” the spokesperson said. “Anyone who wants to keep messaging with end-to-end encryption can easily do that on WhatsApp.” Meta’s chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, first flagged plans to roll out end-to-end encryption across Meta’s suite of platforms in 2019, but did not begin implementing it until 2023 . Meta had endured criticism from child safety groups and an alliance of law enforcement – including the FBI, Interpol, the UK’s National Crime Agency and the Australian federal police – who argued it would weaken the ability to keep children safe online. A spokesperson for the Australian eSafety commissioner’s office said strong encryption plays an important role in protecting privacy and security but where deployed, platforms should also prevent, detect and respond to harm. “Where end-to-end encryption is implemented without appropriate safety measures, it can increase safety risks and prevent the identification of harms such as child sexual exploitation, and terrorism and violent extremism,” the spokesperson said. “Ultimately, whether to deploy end-to-end encryption is a business and design choice for platforms, but it does not remove a platform’s responsibility to prevent harm.” Tom Sulston, head of policy at Digital Rights Watch, said rather than acceding to law enforcement demands, the move was more likely due to Meta deciding against moving messaging on WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram to a single platform. “The fact that WhatsApp is staying encrypted suggests that Meta might be pivoting to segregating social media from chat a bit more – the main distinction being that social media users can discover each other, whereas chat users need to know each other first,” he said. Money was also likely a factor, he said, with Meta potentially able to use message contents to determine advertising and train chatbots. “They may not be doing that now, but the commercial pressure to do it is huge, so it feels inevitable that they will if they’re not already,” he said. Sulston said more tech companies, not less, should be moving to end-to-end encryption. “Why not improve the product, rather than continue to enshittify it?” Explore more on these topics Instagram Meta Social media Encryption Digital media Share Reuse this content More on this story More on this story Child abuse material ‘systemic’ on Elon Musk’s X amid Grok scandal, Australian online safety regulator warned Australia’s pornography age-verification: a victory for advocates or a gateway to ‘darker corners of the internet’? Snapchat told an Australian mother it would not delete her son’s account because his listed age was 25 double quotation mark Without effective regulation of AI, society is facing a head-on collision with a driverless car VPN apps rocket up download charts in Australia as porn websites begin blocking users Australians will have to verify their age to watch pornography from Monday. Here’s what you need to know Porn websites begin blocking Australian users as deadline for age verification looms Retailers want ‘delightfully human’ AI to do your shopping, but will the chatbots go rogue? Three months into Australia’s world-first social media ban for under-16s, has it been a success? ‘Unbelievably dangerous’: experts sound alarm after ChatGPT Health fails to recognise medical emergencies Most viewed Most viewed World UK Climate crisis Ukraine Environment Science Global development Football Tech Business Obituaries