Content Creator

Content creator | The ryg blog Skip to content Follow: RSS Twitter The ryg blog When I grow up I'll be an inventor. Home About Coding Compression Computer Architecture Demoscene Graphics Pipeline Maths Multimedia Networking Papers Stories Thoughts Uncategorized Content creator July 6, 2025 Nobody should voluntarily call themselves that. “Content” is the language of people on the distribution side of things. If you look at something like a 19th century newspaper it’s mostly a logistics exercise. Sure you may think of just back issues on microfilm in national archives or something like that, but the actual business was not the journalism; it was printing, distributing and ultimately selling a folded-up bunch of big sheets of paper to a large number of buyers at regular intervals. It turns out this is only actually a viable business if those pages contain something that people are willing to pay some amount of money to read, hence: “content”! Print and other mass media have changed substantially in the past 150 years, but this part hasn’t changed: “content” is what the people who build and run the logistics side call what gets distributed. I don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with that, mind. I even happen to be one of those people, having spent pretty much my entire professional life so far on “content pipelines” in one form or another. But that language is your hint right there. Staying in the pipeline metaphor, the way I interact with content in my day job as a kind of undifferentiated sludge with mildly caustic characteristics that has an alarming tendency to gum up, corrode and spring leaks in pipes that I’m supposed to keep in working order. But that doesn’t mean that the people creating said content™ should think of it in the same terms. Humans breathe in air and breathe our slightly warmer air that we sometimes even vibrate on the way out for our own reasons, but you wouldn’t call a trained singer a “hot air creator” to their face, would you? What is this faux-technical overly-detached nonsense? If you’re talking about someone else, “content creator” has the feel of “I couldn’t even be bothered to figure out what it is this person makes”, and if you’re talking about your own work, then you’re either fully alienated from your own creative output, or you’re unthinkingly adopting the vantage of someone who views your work as fundamentally fungible and interchangeable. And again, this viewpoint is not inherently bad. For example, in my day job, if some texture makes the data cooking pipeline hiccup, I truly do not care about what that image is supposed to mean in the context of a larger work or whatever. (I rarely even look at the things, it’s mostly a matter of metadata and processing flags being set.) As a “content pipeline plumber”, the nature of the job is that I engage with most of the art I see in my job not at all, or only superficially. But if you’re the one making it, then – fuck no (speaking as someone who has also made, and continues to privately make, art on his own). “Content creator” is just not an acceptable self-descriptor. Have some self-respect for crying out loud. If your work is so heterodox as to defy any easy categorization, all the better. You make “strange experimental art” or whatever. But “content”, please no. Related From → Thoughts Leave a Comment Leave a comment Cancel reply Δ Oodle 2.9.14 and Intel 13th/14th gen CPUs » Recent Posts Content creator Oodle 2.9.14 and Intel 13th/14th gen CPUs UNORM and SNORM to float, hardware edition MRSSE Exact UNORM8 to float BC7 optimal solid-color blocks Why those particular integer multiplies? Inserting a 0 bit in the middle of a value Zero or sign extend When is a BCn/ASTC endpoints-from-indices solve singular? Categories Coding Compression Computer Architecture Demoscene Graphics Pipeline Maths Multimedia Networking Papers Stories Thoughts Uncategorized Archives July 2025 May 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 August 2024 October 2023 July 2023 May 2023 March 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 April 2022 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 July 2019 April 2019 February 2019 December 2018 September 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 April 2017 October 2016 August 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 May 2015 February 2015 December 2014 October 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 March 2014 February 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 May 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 Blog at WordPress.com. Comment Subscribe Subscribed The ryg blog Join 496 other subscribers Sign me up Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now. The ryg blog Subscribe Subscribed Sign up Log in Copy shortlink Report this content View post in Reader Manage subscriptions Collapse this bar